https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176788 The Tribunal partly confirmed the service tax demand against the applicant for the period from 2005-06 to 2009-10 under the category of "Broadcasting Service." Despite the applicant's claim of solely providing up-linking services and being registered under "Business Support Service" since 2006, the Revenue's evidence of broadcasting services provided led to the rejection of the limitation argument. The Tribunal upheld the service of notice under Section 37(C) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, directing a pre-deposit and setting compliance deadlines, emphasizing the need for proper tax payment based on services rendered. en-us Thu, 28 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:38:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176788 The Tribunal partly confirmed the service tax demand against the applicant for the period from 2005-06 to 2009-10 under the category of "Broadcasting Service." Despite the applicant's claim of solely providing up-linking services and being registered under "Business Support Service" since 2006, the Revenue's evidence of broadcasting services provided led to the rejection of the limitation argument. The Tribunal upheld the service of notice under Section 37(C) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, directing a pre-deposit and setting compliance deadlines, emphasizing the need for proper tax payment based on services rendered. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 28 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176788