<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1025 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176751</link>
    <description>Denial of relied upon documents can vitiate adjudication where it prevents an effective defence to the show cause notice. The appellant had sought those documents, but the adjudication order did not clearly record whether they were supplied, and the appellate order also left the issue unresolved. On that basis, the defect was treated as a breach of fair procedure and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after supply of the documents and grant of a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:08:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1025 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176751</link>
      <description>Denial of relied upon documents can vitiate adjudication where it prevents an effective defence to the show cause notice. The appellant had sought those documents, but the adjudication order did not clearly record whether they were supplied, and the appellate order also left the issue unresolved. On that basis, the defect was treated as a breach of fair procedure and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after supply of the documents and grant of a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>