<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1028 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176754</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found a breach of natural justice as crucial reports were not provided to the appellant before passing the order. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by remand for a fair hearing opportunity. The Tribunal did not address the limitation issue, leaving it open for the appellant to raise in subsequent proceedings. The decision emphasized the importance of upholding natural justice principles in matters concerning duty liabilities and compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:08:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1028 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176754</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found a breach of natural justice as crucial reports were not provided to the appellant before passing the order. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed by remand for a fair hearing opportunity. The Tribunal did not address the limitation issue, leaving it open for the appellant to raise in subsequent proceedings. The decision emphasized the importance of upholding natural justice principles in matters concerning duty liabilities and compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>