<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1034 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176760</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for the short receipt of base oil within the normal limitation period, confirmed interest, set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and directed the appellant to pay the differential amount after considering the permissible limit of 0.1% for loss in case of base oil.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 21:08:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1034 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176760</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for the short receipt of base oil within the normal limitation period, confirmed interest, set aside the penalty imposed under Rule 15(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and directed the appellant to pay the differential amount after considering the permissible limit of 0.1% for loss in case of base oil.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>