https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176721 The Tribunal upheld the demand for payment of `8 lakhs based on admissions of unaccounted clearances without duty payment by the appellant firm. The contention for cross-examination was rejected, and the validity of the notice issued within the limitation period was upheld. However, the penalty under Section 11AC was set aside due to insufficient investigation details. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:19:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176721 The Tribunal upheld the demand for payment of `8 lakhs based on admissions of unaccounted clearances without duty payment by the appellant firm. The contention for cross-examination was rejected, and the validity of the notice issued within the limitation period was upheld. However, the penalty under Section 11AC was set aside due to insufficient investigation details. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 16 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176721