<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1087 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the value of drawings supplied by customers should be included in the assessable value of goods. However, it found the 10% value adopted by the Commissioner to be arbitrary and ordered a reevaluation with proper justifications for any new value determined, emphasizing that arbitrary values like 10% cannot be used without adequate basis. The order was set aside, remanding the matter for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1087 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the value of drawings supplied by customers should be included in the assessable value of goods. However, it found the 10% value adopted by the Commissioner to be arbitrary and ordered a reevaluation with proper justifications for any new value determined, emphasizing that arbitrary values like 10% cannot be used without adequate basis. The order was set aside, remanding the matter for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>