<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1089 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision denying SSI exemption under Central Excise Duty, citing discrepancies in clearance calculations and lack of disclosure of the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s report, leading to a violation of natural justice. The matter was remanded for de-novo adjudication, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s right to the report and a personal hearing. The core issue was the calculation of the aggregate value of clearances for home consumption, requiring disclosure of the basis of calculation for a fair resolution. Procedural irregularities in the adjudication process and penalty imposition under sections 11AB and 11AC necessitated a transparent and just process, ensuring parties&#039; access to relevant information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:19:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1089 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision denying SSI exemption under Central Excise Duty, citing discrepancies in clearance calculations and lack of disclosure of the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s report, leading to a violation of natural justice. The matter was remanded for de-novo adjudication, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s right to the report and a personal hearing. The core issue was the calculation of the aggregate value of clearances for home consumption, requiring disclosure of the basis of calculation for a fair resolution. Procedural irregularities in the adjudication process and penalty imposition under sections 11AB and 11AC necessitated a transparent and just process, ensuring parties&#039; access to relevant information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>