<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1087 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on tubular poles manufactured by the appellant from January 2012 to November 2012, allowing Cenvat credit for inputs and directing the appellant to deposit a specified amount while waiving the balance for appeal hearing. The penalty imposed by the Commissioner under Section 11AC was upheld as the Tribunal did not specifically address this issue in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:19:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1087 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on tubular poles manufactured by the appellant from January 2012 to November 2012, allowing Cenvat credit for inputs and directing the appellant to deposit a specified amount while waiving the balance for appeal hearing. The penalty imposed by the Commissioner under Section 11AC was upheld as the Tribunal did not specifically address this issue in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>