https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176738 The court upheld the application of the extended period for duty payment, finding that the applicants had not taken necessary steps to avoid it. However, regarding the admissibility of Cenvat Credit, the matter was remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for further verification and quantification. The applicants were directed to provide required documents for claiming Cenvat Credit, and the Authority was instructed to conduct de-novo proceedings, including quantifying duty liability, penalties, and interest. ROM applications were allowed only concerning the issue of Cenvat Credit admissibility. en-us Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:19:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176738 The court upheld the application of the extended period for duty payment, finding that the applicants had not taken necessary steps to avoid it. However, regarding the admissibility of Cenvat Credit, the matter was remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for further verification and quantification. The applicants were directed to provide required documents for claiming Cenvat Credit, and the Authority was instructed to conduct de-novo proceedings, including quantifying duty liability, penalties, and interest. ROM applications were allowed only concerning the issue of Cenvat Credit admissibility. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176738