<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1098 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that there was no requirement to reverse Cenvat credit on used capital goods cleared to their SEZ unit during the relevant period due to the absence of a recovery mechanism. The decision was supported by case laws and previous Tribunal rulings, leading to the allowance of the appellant&#039;s appeal and the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:19:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1098 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that there was no requirement to reverse Cenvat credit on used capital goods cleared to their SEZ unit during the relevant period due to the absence of a recovery mechanism. The decision was supported by case laws and previous Tribunal rulings, leading to the allowance of the appellant&#039;s appeal and the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>