<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1393 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176713</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Karnataka Rent Control Act applies to fixed term leases, limiting eviction grounds to those in Section 21(1). Lease terms are not entirely overridden, but eviction can only be sought based on statutory grounds during the lease term. The Court clarified that any additional eviction grounds in the lease agreement are inoperative. The High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside, emphasizing that the Act&#039;s provisions prevail over conflicting contractual terms. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2017 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1393 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176713</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Karnataka Rent Control Act applies to fixed term leases, limiting eviction grounds to those in Section 21(1). Lease terms are not entirely overridden, but eviction can only be sought based on statutory grounds during the lease term. The Court clarified that any additional eviction grounds in the lease agreement are inoperative. The High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside, emphasizing that the Act&#039;s provisions prevail over conflicting contractual terms. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>