https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176710 Quasi-judicial decision-making under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act requires a conciliation officer to issue a reasoned, speaking order when approving or refusing approval for discharge of a workman. The duty to give reasons flows from the rule of law, requires consideration of relevant material and legal norms, and guards against arbitrariness. Reasons are also necessary for effective judicial review under Articles 226 and 32. An order refusing approval is a separate and final determination affecting the employer's right to discharge the workman, rather than a merely interlocutory order; it must therefore disclose the reasons supporting the decision. en-us Tue, 05 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:03:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176710 Quasi-judicial decision-making under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act requires a conciliation officer to issue a reasoned, speaking order when approving or refusing approval for discharge of a workman. The duty to give reasons flows from the rule of law, requires consideration of relevant material and legal norms, and guards against arbitrariness. Reasons are also necessary for effective judicial review under Articles 226 and 32. An order refusing approval is a separate and final determination affecting the employer's right to discharge the workman, rather than a merely interlocutory order; it must therefore disclose the reasons supporting the decision. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 05 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176710