<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1063 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176709</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the disallowances made by the lower authorities on all three issues. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source was rejected as the expenses were adjusted against amounts payable. The disallowance of traveling expenses and business promotion expenses was also overturned, considering the reasonableness of the expenses in relation to turnover and income, and the business necessity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1063 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176709</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, overturning the disallowances made by the lower authorities on all three issues. The disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of tax at source was rejected as the expenses were adjusted against amounts payable. The disallowance of traveling expenses and business promotion expenses was also overturned, considering the reasonableness of the expenses in relation to turnover and income, and the business necessity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>