<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Wins Central Excise Duty Refund Case; Successfully Proves No Unjust Enrichment as Amount Listed as Loan.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26639</link>
    <description>Refund - Excess tax paid - duty was paid on higher price - unjust enrichment - appellant has been showing the amount for which refund is claimed, in the balance sheet under head loan and in advances. - appellant has not expensed out the amounts which have been paid by them as excess Central Excise duty - Refund allowed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 12:30:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 12:30:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Wins Central Excise Duty Refund Case; Successfully Proves No Unjust Enrichment as Amount Listed as Loan.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26639</link>
      <description>Refund - Excess tax paid - duty was paid on higher price - unjust enrichment - appellant has been showing the amount for which refund is claimed, in the balance sheet under head loan and in advances. - appellant has not expensed out the amounts which have been paid by them as excess Central Excise duty - Refund allowed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 12:30:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>