https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176700 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order. The decision highlighted the lack of evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal of goods and acknowledged the appellants' prompt rectification of invoice mistakes. Additionally, the Tribunal aligned with legal precedents in excluding freight and insurance charges from the assessable value, providing relief to the appellants on both issues. en-us Wed, 26 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:39:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176700 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order. The decision highlighted the lack of evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal of goods and acknowledged the appellants' prompt rectification of invoice mistakes. Additionally, the Tribunal aligned with legal precedents in excluding freight and insurance charges from the assessable value, providing relief to the appellants on both issues. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 26 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176700