https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176699 Judicial review of court-martial proceedings is confined to jurisdictional error, apparent legal error, breach of natural justice, or perversity, and does not permit reappreciation of evidence. On that basis, evidence supporting Charges 2, 3 and 8 was held admissible and capable of evaluation by the court-martial, so the High Court's interference with those findings was set aside. Charge 9 was found vague and not properly aligned with the governing reporting instruction, because it did not clearly allege the requisite incident or responsibility. As the sentence had been imposed on all charges, it could not stand unchanged once one charge failed, and sentence reconsideration was required on the surviving findings. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:02:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176699 Judicial review of court-martial proceedings is confined to jurisdictional error, apparent legal error, breach of natural justice, or perversity, and does not permit reappreciation of evidence. On that basis, evidence supporting Charges 2, 3 and 8 was held admissible and capable of evaluation by the court-martial, so the High Court's interference with those findings was set aside. Charge 9 was found vague and not properly aligned with the governing reporting instruction, because it did not clearly allege the requisite incident or responsibility. As the sentence had been imposed on all charges, it could not stand unchanged once one charge failed, and sentence reconsideration was required on the surviving findings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176699