<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 650 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176699</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment except for Charge No. 9. The Court Martial&#039;s sentence was also set aside, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration based on Charges 2, 3, and 8. Additionally, the Supreme Court recommended initiating proceedings against witnesses who admitted to signing or preparing official records at the respondent&#039;s direction without verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 650 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176699</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment except for Charge No. 9. The Court Martial&#039;s sentence was also set aside, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration based on Charges 2, 3, and 8. Additionally, the Supreme Court recommended initiating proceedings against witnesses who admitted to signing or preparing official records at the respondent&#039;s direction without verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>