https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176693 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed two applications for condonation of delay in filing an appeal due to lack of evidence justifying the delay. The appellants' claims of delay caused by the peon's failure to promptly deliver the order to the Managing Director were unsupported by evidence or affidavits. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the grounds for delay, leading to the dismissal of the applications for condonation of delay, stay petitions, and appeals. This case underscores the necessity of providing concrete evidence to support claims when seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings to ensure a fair and just outcome. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:57:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176693 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD dismissed two applications for condonation of delay in filing an appeal due to lack of evidence justifying the delay. The appellants' claims of delay caused by the peon's failure to promptly deliver the order to the Managing Director were unsupported by evidence or affidavits. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the grounds for delay, leading to the dismissal of the applications for condonation of delay, stay petitions, and appeals. This case underscores the necessity of providing concrete evidence to support claims when seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings to ensure a fair and just outcome. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176693