<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1355 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no grounds for penalty imposition under the Central Excise Act and Rules due to discrepancies in scrap clearances and invoicing. While duty and interest were upheld, the penalty was reduced to 25% of the duty amount as the assessee had already paid the duty and interest before adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1355 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no grounds for penalty imposition under the Central Excise Act and Rules due to discrepancies in scrap clearances and invoicing. While duty and interest were upheld, the penalty was reduced to 25% of the duty amount as the assessee had already paid the duty and interest before adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>