<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1346 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270042</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for a refund claim of excess Excise duty paid, ruling in favor of the appellant based on the agreement terms and supporting evidence provided. The tribunal found that the appellant had discharged duty liability correctly and was entitled to the refund as per the specific agreement terms and factual evidence presented, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 12:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1346 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270042</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal for a refund claim of excess Excise duty paid, ruling in favor of the appellant based on the agreement terms and supporting evidence provided. The tribunal found that the appellant had discharged duty liability correctly and was entitled to the refund as per the specific agreement terms and factual evidence presented, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and granting consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>