<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1344 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of declared transaction values and the determination of value under Rule 8, based on manufacturer&#039;s price lists. The demand for differential duty and interest, as well as penalties on two firms and Shri Nitin Shah, were upheld. The Tribunal stressed accurate declarations and adherence to valuation rules for proper customs duty assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1344 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of declared transaction values and the determination of value under Rule 8, based on manufacturer&#039;s price lists. The demand for differential duty and interest, as well as penalties on two firms and Shri Nitin Shah, were upheld. The Tribunal stressed accurate declarations and adherence to valuation rules for proper customs duty assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>