<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1339 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270035</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay a nominal sum of Rs. 2,000 for the release of goods under Section 72(1) of the Tamilnadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, due to the lack of evidence of tax evasion. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper documentation for interstate transactions and the application of tax laws for compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:48:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1339 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270035</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to pay a nominal sum of Rs. 2,000 for the release of goods under Section 72(1) of the Tamilnadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, due to the lack of evidence of tax evasion. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper documentation for interstate transactions and the application of tax laws for compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>