<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1338 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270034</link>
    <description>Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act permits rectification of any error apparent on the face of the record, and sub-section (4) allows that power to be exercised even where the assessment has already been appealed or revised. A rejection of a rectification application without deciding the merits and without affording the applicant an opportunity of hearing was not sustainable. The rejection order was therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration on merits after due hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:48:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1338 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270034</link>
      <description>Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act permits rectification of any error apparent on the face of the record, and sub-section (4) allows that power to be exercised even where the assessment has already been appealed or revised. A rejection of a rectification application without deciding the merits and without affording the applicant an opportunity of hearing was not sustainable. The rejection order was therefore set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration on merits after due hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>