<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 512 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176689</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of excessive commission paid by the assessee under section 40(A)(2) of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of establishing nexus and genuineness of expenditure, dismissing the assessing authority&#039;s attempt to dictate the commission rate. The argument regarding undisclosed business activities was rejected for failing to prove non-payment or excessiveness of commission. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 13:52:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 512 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176689</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance of excessive commission paid by the assessee under section 40(A)(2) of the Income-tax Act. The Court emphasized the importance of establishing nexus and genuineness of expenditure, dismissing the assessing authority&#039;s attempt to dictate the commission rate. The argument regarding undisclosed business activities was rejected for failing to prove non-payment or excessiveness of commission. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>