<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1218 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176678</link>
    <description>A binding CBDT circular under section 119 was treated as controlling the tax treatment of interest on sticky advances and doubtful loans, so such interest was not brought to tax on accrual where the circular&#039;s conditions were met and the bank credited it to a suspense account. The commentary also notes that a forfeited dividend provision, treated as an appropriation of post-tax profits rather than a charge against profits, did not justify an addition, and the appellate relief deleting that adjustment was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1218 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176678</link>
      <description>A binding CBDT circular under section 119 was treated as controlling the tax treatment of interest on sticky advances and doubtful loans, so such interest was not brought to tax on accrual where the circular&#039;s conditions were met and the bank credited it to a suspense account. The commentary also notes that a forfeited dividend provision, treated as an appropriation of post-tax profits rather than a charge against profits, did not justify an addition, and the appellate relief deleting that adjustment was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>