<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2466 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176681</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for A.Y. 2006-07. The Court upheld the deletion of disallowance under Rule 8D(2) r.w.s. 14A of the Act, citing the settled legal position established in a specific court decision. It was determined that the issues raised did not give rise to any substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2015 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2466 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176681</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for A.Y. 2006-07. The Court upheld the deletion of disallowance under Rule 8D(2) r.w.s. 14A of the Act, citing the settled legal position established in a specific court decision. It was determined that the issues raised did not give rise to any substantial question of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>