https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270027 The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned orders, and directed the respondent to reconsider the petition filed under Sections 220(3) and 220(6) in conformity with CBDT Instruction No.95, providing an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. The court emphasized the importance of exercising discretion in favor of the assessee in high pitched assessments and adhering to procedural fairness. en-us Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270027 The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned orders, and directed the respondent to reconsider the petition filed under Sections 220(3) and 220(6) in conformity with CBDT Instruction No.95, providing an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. The court emphasized the importance of exercising discretion in favor of the assessee in high pitched assessments and adhering to procedural fairness. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270027