<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1670</link>
    <description>Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 operates as a self-contained mechanism for recovering a presumptive amount where common inputs are used for dutiable and exempted final products and separate inventories are not maintained, and its application is not confined to factory-gate sales. The expression &quot;price&quot; is treated as a valuation measure, so exempted goods cleared by stock transfer are also covered. On limitation, the extended period requires strict proof of suppression, fraud or collusion with intent to evade duty; on the facts, the first show cause notice was time barred, while the later two notices were within time and required fresh determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 11:04:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=41066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1670</link>
      <description>Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 operates as a self-contained mechanism for recovering a presumptive amount where common inputs are used for dutiable and exempted final products and separate inventories are not maintained, and its application is not confined to factory-gate sales. The expression &quot;price&quot; is treated as a valuation measure, so exempted goods cleared by stock transfer are also covered. On limitation, the extended period requires strict proof of suppression, fraud or collusion with intent to evade duty; on the facts, the first show cause notice was time barred, while the later two notices were within time and required fresh determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>