<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1317 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant to adjust excess service tax paid without refunding it to customers, as the payment was due to a calculation error and not recovered from clients. The Tribunal emphasized mandatory compliance with Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, setting aside the order-in-revision and allowing the appeal despite conflicting precedent in Nirma Architects &amp;amp; Valuers case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1317 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant to adjust excess service tax paid without refunding it to customers, as the payment was due to a calculation error and not recovered from clients. The Tribunal emphasized mandatory compliance with Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, setting aside the order-in-revision and allowing the appeal despite conflicting precedent in Nirma Architects &amp;amp; Valuers case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>