<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 921 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176675</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, highlighting that the dispute was fundamentally civil and should be addressed in a civil court. The Court directed the civil court to promptly resolve the pending civil suit. It stressed the importance of judicial officers applying their minds when taking cognizance of offenses and reiterated the disparity between civil and criminal wrongs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 921 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176675</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, highlighting that the dispute was fundamentally civil and should be addressed in a civil court. The Court directed the civil court to promptly resolve the pending civil suit. It stressed the importance of judicial officers applying their minds when taking cognizance of offenses and reiterated the disparity between civil and criminal wrongs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>