<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1314 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270010</link>
    <description>Goods classification under Chapter Heading 7323.90 was examined, and the Tribunal&#039;s classification was found to suffer from no infirmity. The appellate challenge therefore failed, and the classification adopted by the Tribunal was left undisturbed. The document also notes that the tax effect was limited, but the decisive point was the absence of any error in the classification analysis. As a result, the challenge to the revenue&#039;s case was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2021 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1314 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270010</link>
      <description>Goods classification under Chapter Heading 7323.90 was examined, and the Tribunal&#039;s classification was found to suffer from no infirmity. The appellate challenge therefore failed, and the classification adopted by the Tribunal was left undisturbed. The document also notes that the tax effect was limited, but the decisive point was the absence of any error in the classification analysis. As a result, the challenge to the revenue&#039;s case was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>