<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1312 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270008</link>
    <description>Royalty was held deductible from assessable value where payment to the principal was established, and the earlier appellate order on that point had attained finality because it was not challenged. On remand, the adjudicating authority verified the evidence, found that royalty had in fact been paid, and excluded it from the assessable value in accordance with the earlier direction. The later appeal was treated as an attempt to reopen an issue already concluded, and the subsequent proceedings were held barred by merger of the later order into the unchallenged appellate determination. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was therefore dismissed as not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1312 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270008</link>
      <description>Royalty was held deductible from assessable value where payment to the principal was established, and the earlier appellate order on that point had attained finality because it was not challenged. On remand, the adjudicating authority verified the evidence, found that royalty had in fact been paid, and excluded it from the assessable value in accordance with the earlier direction. The later appeal was treated as an attempt to reopen an issue already concluded, and the subsequent proceedings were held barred by merger of the later order into the unchallenged appellate determination. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was therefore dismissed as not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>