<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1312 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning excess stock confiscation, duty on shortages, and recovery of royalty and freight charges. The Doctrine of Merger applied as the appellate order had already addressed the royalty deduction issue, finding evidence of payment. The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, concluding that subsequent appeals by the Revenue were dismissed due to the issue&#039;s finality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1312 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning excess stock confiscation, duty on shortages, and recovery of royalty and freight charges. The Doctrine of Merger applied as the appellate order had already addressed the royalty deduction issue, finding evidence of payment. The Tribunal upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, concluding that subsequent appeals by the Revenue were dismissed due to the issue&#039;s finality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>