<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1307 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270003</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to deny Cenvat Credit to the appellants based on endorsed invoices, citing Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules and the withdrawal of the Simplified Textile Scheme in 2004. The limitation period for filing the appeal was deemed valid, leading to the rejection of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 11:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1307 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270003</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to deny Cenvat Credit to the appellants based on endorsed invoices, citing Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules and the withdrawal of the Simplified Textile Scheme in 2004. The limitation period for filing the appeal was deemed valid, leading to the rejection of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=270003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>