https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269997 The court directed the petitioner to pay redemption charges, costs, and penalty within two weeks for the redemption and re-export of seized goods, emphasizing compliance within the specified timeframe and warning against violations post-redemption. The court found the authorities' inaction in releasing the goods after 5 years unsustainable, noting no legal impediment for redemption as per the adjudication order. Despite the respondent's argument of untimeliness, the court held that the petitioner's representations were not duly considered, leading to prejudice. en-us Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269997 The court directed the petitioner to pay redemption charges, costs, and penalty within two weeks for the redemption and re-export of seized goods, emphasizing compliance within the specified timeframe and warning against violations post-redemption. The court found the authorities' inaction in releasing the goods after 5 years unsustainable, noting no legal impediment for redemption as per the adjudication order. Despite the respondent's argument of untimeliness, the court held that the petitioner's representations were not duly considered, leading to prejudice. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269997