https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269990 The court quashed the FIR, chargesheet, and all related proceedings, ruling that the funds received were gifts from the petitioner's father and not foreign contributions requiring permission. The court applied the more lenient FCRA, 2010, over FCRA, 1976, granting the petitioner exemptions and benefits under the newer legislation. The court also found procedural lapses in the Revisional Court's order and emphasized the accused's right to be heard. Subsequent legislation favoring the accused was applied, leading to the dismissal of certain applications and directing the Central Government to consider compounding the case under FCRA, 2010. en-us Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Dec 2015 22:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269990 The court quashed the FIR, chargesheet, and all related proceedings, ruling that the funds received were gifts from the petitioner's father and not foreign contributions requiring permission. The court applied the more lenient FCRA, 2010, over FCRA, 1976, granting the petitioner exemptions and benefits under the newer legislation. The court also found procedural lapses in the Revisional Court's order and emphasized the accused's right to be heard. Subsequent legislation favoring the accused was applied, leading to the dismissal of certain applications and directing the Central Government to consider compounding the case under FCRA, 2010. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269990