<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1065 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176654</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the addition to the assessee&#039;s income due to discrepancies in sale price compared to opening stock price. The CIT(A) upheld the addition, but the tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the addition to Rs. 2 lakhs to prevent revenue loss. The tribunal also overturned the CIT(A) decision on interest levied under section 234B, deeming it arbitrary and unjustified. The judgment emphasized the importance of justifying pricing differences and maintaining tax integrity, ultimately favoring a balanced approach in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 22:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1065 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176654</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the addition to the assessee&#039;s income due to discrepancies in sale price compared to opening stock price. The CIT(A) upheld the addition, but the tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the addition to Rs. 2 lakhs to prevent revenue loss. The tribunal also overturned the CIT(A) decision on interest levied under section 234B, deeming it arbitrary and unjustified. The judgment emphasized the importance of justifying pricing differences and maintaining tax integrity, ultimately favoring a balanced approach in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>