<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1018 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176646</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, finding that the alleged sundry creditors were fictitious and not payable by the appellant. It clarified that the amount in question could not be taxed under Section 41(1) or Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as there was no cessation of liability in the relevant assessment year and the credit to the creditors&#039; accounts was made in earlier years. The ITAT dismissed the issue of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:34:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1018 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176646</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, finding that the alleged sundry creditors were fictitious and not payable by the appellant. It clarified that the amount in question could not be taxed under Section 41(1) or Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, as there was no cessation of liability in the relevant assessment year and the credit to the creditors&#039; accounts was made in earlier years. The ITAT dismissed the issue of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>