<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1286 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269982</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of agency dealership commission under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2004-05. The ITAT found the commission payment to an agent outside India to be a legitimate business expenditure, in line with previous decisions and Circular No:786. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:31:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1286 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269982</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of agency dealership commission under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2004-05. The ITAT found the commission payment to an agent outside India to be a legitimate business expenditure, in line with previous decisions and Circular No:786. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>