<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1285 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269981</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reassessment by the AO, based on the same facts as the original assessment and without new material, constituted a mere change of opinion. The reassessment was deemed unwarranted and invalid, leading to the allowance of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence for valid reassessments and the adherence to established legal principles in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:31:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1285 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269981</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the reassessment by the AO, based on the same facts as the original assessment and without new material, constituted a mere change of opinion. The reassessment was deemed unwarranted and invalid, leading to the allowance of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of tangible evidence for valid reassessments and the adherence to established legal principles in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>