<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1280 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269976</link>
    <description>ITAT held that the AO lacked jurisdiction to issue notice under s.148 for years falling within six years preceding the year of search; those years fall exclusively under s.153A. As assessment arose from a search, the AO was required to issue notice under s.153C and proceed under s.153A, not under s.147/148. The assessment order passed u/s.143(3) read with s.147 was quashed as illegal and without jurisdiction. Decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1280 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269976</link>
      <description>ITAT held that the AO lacked jurisdiction to issue notice under s.148 for years falling within six years preceding the year of search; those years fall exclusively under s.153A. As assessment arose from a search, the AO was required to issue notice under s.153C and proceed under s.153A, not under s.147/148. The assessment order passed u/s.143(3) read with s.147 was quashed as illegal and without jurisdiction. Decision in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>