<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1269 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269965</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing CENVAT credit for transit insurance, insurance service, and photography/validation service. The decision emphasized the eligibility of services directly or indirectly connected to manufacturing activities for CENVAT credit under the law. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, concluding that the denial of CENVAT credit on these services was incorrect, citing relevant rules and previous judgments to support their decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1269 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269965</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing CENVAT credit for transit insurance, insurance service, and photography/validation service. The decision emphasized the eligibility of services directly or indirectly connected to manufacturing activities for CENVAT credit under the law. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, concluding that the denial of CENVAT credit on these services was incorrect, citing relevant rules and previous judgments to support their decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>