<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1264 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the absence of substantial evidence to refute the explanation provided regarding the production figures&#039; discrepancy. The decision highlighted the importance of considering the nature and purpose of different registers in assessing duty payment obligations, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on the Commissioner(Appeals)&#039;s reasoned findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1264 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the absence of substantial evidence to refute the explanation provided regarding the production figures&#039; discrepancy. The decision highlighted the importance of considering the nature and purpose of different registers in assessing duty payment obligations, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on the Commissioner(Appeals)&#039;s reasoned findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>