<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1253 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269949</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under Section 117 of the Customs Act 1962 without show-cause notices. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s request for confiscation, redemption fines, and penalties under Section 112 due to lack of prior proposals and notices. The judgment emphasized the need for proper documentation on imported goods&#039; value and duty liabilities. Penalties for not having an Importer Exporter Code were deemed sufficient, and no remand was necessary for additional penalties under Section 112. Importers were given the opportunity to contest proposed penalties, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:21:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1253 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269949</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under Section 117 of the Customs Act 1962 without show-cause notices. It rejected the Revenue&#039;s request for confiscation, redemption fines, and penalties under Section 112 due to lack of prior proposals and notices. The judgment emphasized the need for proper documentation on imported goods&#039; value and duty liabilities. Penalties for not having an Importer Exporter Code were deemed sufficient, and no remand was necessary for additional penalties under Section 112. Importers were given the opportunity to contest proposed penalties, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>