<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1252 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the classification of Extraneal Peritoneal Dialysis Solution under Chapter Heading 9018 as medical equipment, attracting a nil rate of Customs duty. The decision was based on legal precedents and specific provisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The Tribunal ordered a refund of the amount deposited by the respondent within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:20:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1252 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the classification of Extraneal Peritoneal Dialysis Solution under Chapter Heading 9018 as medical equipment, attracting a nil rate of Customs duty. The decision was based on legal precedents and specific provisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The Tribunal ordered a refund of the amount deposited by the respondent within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>