<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 960 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176631</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for early hearing of the appeal and set aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant for violating the import/export policy. Citing a precedent case and Foreign Trade Policy provisions, the Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of clarifications issued by DGFT and the importance of consistency in applying import policies. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant based on these considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:18:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 960 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176631</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for early hearing of the appeal and set aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant for violating the import/export policy. Citing a precedent case and Foreign Trade Policy provisions, the Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of clarifications issued by DGFT and the importance of consistency in applying import policies. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant based on these considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>