https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176637 The judgment upheld the customs duty demand on the appellant for sharing capital goods with a related company, emphasizing the distinction between ownership and control in determining liability. The calculation of duty from the sharing commencement date was deemed appropriate, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lacking merit. en-us Mon, 25 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176637 The judgment upheld the customs duty demand on the appellant for sharing capital goods with a related company, emphasizing the distinction between ownership and control in determining liability. The calculation of duty from the sharing commencement date was deemed appropriate, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lacking merit. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 25 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176637