<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1075 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176605</link>
    <description>Established lapses in supervision and compliance with licensing regulations can justify penal action against a CHA, but continued revocation may be excessive where the licensee has already remained out of business for more than 3.5 years. The punishment already suffered was treated as sufficient in the circumstances, so the revocation of the CHA licence was set aside and the licence was directed to become operative with immediate effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 09:31:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1075 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176605</link>
      <description>Established lapses in supervision and compliance with licensing regulations can justify penal action against a CHA, but continued revocation may be excessive where the licensee has already remained out of business for more than 3.5 years. The punishment already suffered was treated as sufficient in the circumstances, so the revocation of the CHA licence was set aside and the licence was directed to become operative with immediate effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>