https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176594 The court allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned orders and providing consequential relief. The judge relied on established decisions and precedents, emphasizing that the absence of the required endorsement on the invoices should not be the sole ground for denying the benefit of the notification regarding the refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) under Notification No. 102/2007. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Dec 2015 09:00:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176594 The court allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned orders and providing consequential relief. The judge relied on established decisions and precedents, emphasizing that the absence of the required endorsement on the invoices should not be the sole ground for denying the benefit of the notification regarding the refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) under Notification No. 102/2007. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176594