<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1079 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176595</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bengaluru due to being time-barred. The appellant failed to file the appeal within the permissible time limit, exceeding it significantly without a satisfactory explanation or application for condonation of delay. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (A) that the appeal was clearly barred by limitation, leading to the dismissal without considering the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 09:00:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1079 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176595</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bengaluru due to being time-barred. The appellant failed to file the appeal within the permissible time limit, exceeding it significantly without a satisfactory explanation or application for condonation of delay. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (A) that the appeal was clearly barred by limitation, leading to the dismissal without considering the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>