<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1075 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176590</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication, instructing the Commissioner to consider the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding differential duty payments and the applicability of the extended limitation period. The judgment highlighted the importance of evaluating all relevant factors in determining duty demands and issuing show cause notices within the prescribed time limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 23:19:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1075 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176590</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication, instructing the Commissioner to consider the appellant&#039;s arguments regarding differential duty payments and the applicability of the extended limitation period. The judgment highlighted the importance of evaluating all relevant factors in determining duty demands and issuing show cause notices within the prescribed time limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>