<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1045 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176568</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the suspension of the Customs Broker License, allowing the appellant to operate as a Customs House Agent (CHA) pending completion of the inquiry by the customs authority. The suspension had exceeded the statutory 9-month investigation period under the Customs Broker License Regulations, 2013. The Tribunal revoked the suspension orders from December 19, 2013, and January 13, 2014, emphasizing equity and justice in its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 23:11:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1045 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176568</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the suspension of the Customs Broker License, allowing the appellant to operate as a Customs House Agent (CHA) pending completion of the inquiry by the customs authority. The suspension had exceeded the statutory 9-month investigation period under the Customs Broker License Regulations, 2013. The Tribunal revoked the suspension orders from December 19, 2013, and January 13, 2014, emphasizing equity and justice in its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>